| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> For anything I wrote from scratch, I'm fine with any licence that |
| 4 |
> allows package manager authors to relicence it under whatever it is |
| 5 |
> they use themselves. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Thanks. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I remain unconvinced that any of this is relevant, and by sticking |
| 10 |
> an explicit licence on the code we're probably just making things |
| 11 |
> worse... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Well, CC0-1.0-Universal isn't really a license, it's rather a |
| 14 |
copyright waiver. Comparable to WTFPL-2, but with a wording that may |
| 15 |
be more appropriate in some situations. ;) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ulrich |
Archives