Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarify wording on self-blockers | ||
| Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:47:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110427184621.6e68e248@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarify wording on self-blockers by Maciej Mrozowski |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:40:47 +0200 |
| 2 | Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > I'd say using "in some ancient portage" argument all over again to |
| 4 | > reinforce particular point of view is not valid. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Uh, no, that's the entire point of EAPIs. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarify wording on self-blockers | Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> |