1 |
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 06:38:57PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:24:45 +0100 |
3 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> > >> Patch is attached. Please review and commit. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > > Please point me to the reasonable steps you have taken to ensure |
8 |
> > > that there are no users with kdebuild-1 packages installed. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > See the rest of this thread, no need to repeat things. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I shall refer you to 20080828: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > Decision: Council will vote to resolve conflicts that the PMS editors |
15 |
> > and PM developers weren't able to resolve. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> There is a conflict that won't be resolved until I'm convinced that the |
18 |
> reasonable steps I've requested to ensure that the impact of this |
19 |
> change is as minimal as possible have been followed. If you'd like to |
20 |
> convince me of that here, there's no need for a Council vote; |
21 |
> otherwise, we'll follow the procedure. |
22 |
|
23 |
Frankly, taking this to the council gets my vote. |
24 |
|
25 |
PMS cannot be ran in such a way that one person stonewalling is |
26 |
able to hold up the majority's will. That's always been a flaw w/ how |
27 |
it was managed and has impacted the resultant spec several times over. |
28 |
|
29 |
If you want to stonewall this, go for it- it would be good to see the |
30 |
council smack it down just for the sake of making it harder in the |
31 |
future for this particular card to be played. |
32 |
|
33 |
Also, unless I'm on crack, the person leading PMS is fauli- I'd expect |
34 |
he's the one who can pull the veto trick, not you. |
35 |
~harring |