Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 10:05:52
Message-Id: 20100109085821.7cf45202@snowmobile
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features by Ulrich Mueller
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> > Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there should > > be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively? > > Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed: > > | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with > | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted.
Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least one version of bash-3.2_psomething". -- Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>