Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:42:06
Message-Id: 20120429194137.28473ee9@sera-17.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 by Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:50:43 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:20:01 +0200 > Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> wrote: > > * IMPLICIT_IUSE > > > > Finally allow to write legal ebuilds respecting Prefix wish to not > > have to add prefix to IUSE. A solution was proposed and approved > > by council. > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366555 > > That one's one of the "things that were left out of EAPI 4". > IMPLICIT_IUSE isn't something you can do on its own without the rest > of the original-EAPI-3 USE cleanup. > >
Is there anything beside the IMPLICIT_IUSE left from the original EAPI 3 proposal which didn't made it into either EAPI 3 or 4 but would be required? I don't mind if EAPI 5 is the only EAPI properly handling this case and declaring it undefined behaviour (in fact the same as the current situation) for earlier ones. Ralph

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature