Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
To: "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>, council@g.o
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 4 approval
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:06:53
Message-Id: 87395178-970f-4a86-a84b-d28031c4cfd7@email.android.com
"Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Dne 29.12.2010 23:50, Alex Alexander napsal(a): >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 04:07:27AM -0800, Brian Harring wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:23:26AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>> >>>>> So unless there are any last-minute changes (Fauli?), the >following >>>>> commit should be tagged: >>>> >>>> There's another trivial update (removal of an unused file, output >is >>>> not affected), so the commit to be tagged is: >>>> ><http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc> >>> >>> +1 on 348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc as the tagging point. >> >> +1 on commit 348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc from me as >well. >> > >+1 on commit 348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc
Me too.