Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
To: "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>, council@g.o
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 4 approval
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:06:53
Message-Id: 87395178-970f-4a86-a84b-d28031c4cfd7@email.android.com
1 "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o> wrote:
2
3 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
4 >Hash: SHA1
5 >
6 >Dne 29.12.2010 23:50, Alex Alexander napsal(a):
7 >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 04:07:27AM -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
8 >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:23:26AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
9 >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
10 >>>>
11 >>>>> So unless there are any last-minute changes (Fauli?), the
12 >following
13 >>>>> commit should be tagged:
14 >>>>
15 >>>> There's another trivial update (removal of an unused file, output
16 >is
17 >>>> not affected), so the commit to be tagged is:
18 >>>>
19 ><http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc>
20 >>>
21 >>> +1 on 348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc as the tagging point.
22 >>
23 >> +1 on commit 348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc from me as
24 >well.
25 >>
26 >
27 >+1 on commit 348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc
28
29 Me too.