From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o, David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] ~ ignores revision parts | ||
Date: | Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:59:10 | ||
Message-Id: | 20091103145900.3b85f23d@snowmobile | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] ~ ignores revision parts by David Leverton |
1 | On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:38:18 +0100 |
2 | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > The current tree doesn't appear to rely on any particular behaviour, |
4 | > so match what Portage does. |
5 | |
6 | Should probably say it's undefined behaviour if there's a revision in |
7 | the specified version. |
8 | |
9 | -- |
10 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |