Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o, David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] ~ ignores revision parts
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:59:10
Message-Id: 20091103145900.3b85f23d@snowmobile
In Reply to: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] ~ ignores revision parts by David Leverton
1 On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:38:18 +0100
2 David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3 > The current tree doesn't appear to rely on any particular behaviour,
4 > so match what Portage does.
5
6 Should probably say it's undefined behaviour if there's a revision in
7 the specified version.
8
9 --
10 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature