Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Cc: Petteri RRRty <betelgeuse@g.o>, council@g.o, gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 4 approval
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:08:04
Message-Id: 20101229120727.GB12162@hrair
In Reply to: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 4 approval by Ulrich Mueller
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:23:26AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > So unless there are any last-minute changes (Fauli?), the following > > commit should be tagged: > > There's another trivial update (removal of an unused file, output is > not affected), so the commit to be tagged is: > <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc>
+1 on 348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc as the tagging point.
> > The tag should be called "eapi-4-approved-2010-12-30" if we follow the > > convention we used for EAPIs 2 and 3.
I'm personally of the opinion that should just be "eapi-4"; the commit msg can include the approval specifics. If we need to approve a tweaked version of eapi4 itself- just name it "eapi-4-v1" or whatever. Jamming the approval date in is annoying however. ~brian