1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:49:38 +0100 |
6 |
> Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > as the council did not show any interest in further additions to |
8 |
> > EAPI 3 on their mailing list [1] and most PMS, council, Prefix and |
9 |
> > PM members will be happy to push out an decideable EAPI 3 draft |
10 |
> > fast, I want to tie the features: |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > * mtime preservation, bug 264130 |
13 |
> > * Prefix offset support, bug 296716 |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > No matter how nice other features would be, we should regard EAPI |
16 |
> > 3 similar to EAPI 1 which was a quick thing to get some small |
17 |
> > features done. Any objections? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Unfortunately, Zac is doing otherwise, and experience shows that what |
20 |
> Zac does ends up being the final decision. You'll need to either |
21 |
> convince him to revert the other things he's put in EAPI 3 (which I |
22 |
> think is just unpack changes, so far), or get the Council to make him |
23 |
> do so, or persuade the Council to change their minds on what's in 3. |
24 |
|
25 |
No council decision, no xz support, no need for moaning. Apart from |
26 |
Zac other people have commit access to the Portage repository. The |
27 |
alternative is to get the council moving and vote at least on that as |
28 |
it is really useful. ulm, mail vote? |
29 |
|
30 |
V-Li |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
34 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
35 |
|
36 |
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |