Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Scope of EAPI 3
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:10:29
Message-Id: 20091217001024.6b98d1e8@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] Scope of EAPI 3 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Hi,
2
3 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>:
4
5 > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:49:38 +0100
6 > Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote:
7 > > as the council did not show any interest in further additions to
8 > > EAPI 3 on their mailing list [1] and most PMS, council, Prefix and
9 > > PM members will be happy to push out an decideable EAPI 3 draft
10 > > fast, I want to tie the features:
11 > >
12 > > * mtime preservation, bug 264130
13 > > * Prefix offset support, bug 296716
14 > >
15 > > No matter how nice other features would be, we should regard EAPI
16 > > 3 similar to EAPI 1 which was a quick thing to get some small
17 > > features done. Any objections?
18 >
19 > Unfortunately, Zac is doing otherwise, and experience shows that what
20 > Zac does ends up being the final decision. You'll need to either
21 > convince him to revert the other things he's put in EAPI 3 (which I
22 > think is just unpack changes, so far), or get the Council to make him
23 > do so, or persuade the Council to change their minds on what's in 3.
24
25 No council decision, no xz support, no need for moaning. Apart from
26 Zac other people have commit access to the Portage repository. The
27 alternative is to get the council moving and vote at least on that as
28 it is really useful. ulm, mail vote?
29
30 V-Li
31
32 --
33 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
34 <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
35
36 <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature