Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarify wording on self-blockers
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:19:34
Message-Id: 19895.3237.434300.678486@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarify wording on self-blockers by Ciaran McCreesh
>>>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Portage ignores self-blockers both in DEPEND and RDEPEND.
> Even strong blockers?
No, strongs blockers are honoured in this case. (Which is fine, since the spec says "A strong block must not be ignored.") Updated patch (I've added the word "weak") is included below.
> Also, what happens for packages that can't be rebuilt once they're > installed (e.g. because they screw up and use stuff on / if it's > there)?
Such packages should be fixed. But if someone really needs a DEPEND blocker on the ebuild's version itself, he can use EAPI 2 or later and a strong blocker.
> We've got this weird situation where DEPEND=!!self would prevent you > from upgrading or downgrading, but wouldn't stop you from rebuilding > the exact same version. That doesn't seem right.
> It seems weird that we're mandating that a package manager should > just outright ignore bits of dependency variables. Maybe it would be > better to mark it as undefined as to whether or not the package > manager honours such a block (and tell people not to do it), and > then for the next EAPI figure out the logical meaning and specify > that?
I don't like adding such "undefined" bits in cases where portage behaviour is well-defined. Ulrich From 5935aa87d46a97a72c8c032728f50a6ecbdf864d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:10:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify wording on self-blockers. --- dependencies.tex | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/dependencies.tex b/dependencies.tex index 362f6cc..f6318d8 100644 --- a/dependencies.tex +++ b/dependencies.tex @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ following exceptions: \begin{compactitem} \item Blocks on a package provided exclusively by the ebuild do not count. \label{provided-blocks} -\item Blocks on the ebuild itself do not count. +\item Weak blocks on the package version of the ebuild itself do not count. \end{compactitem} \featurelabel{bang-strength} There are two strengths of block: weak and strong. A weak block may be -- 1.7.5.rc1

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarify wording on self-blockers Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>