| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100 |
| 6 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there |
| 8 |
> > > should be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed: |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with |
| 13 |
> > | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single |
| 16 |
> 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable |
| 17 |
> with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least |
| 18 |
> one version of bash-3.2_psomething". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
So one has to work around obvious bugs to satisfy p0? p9999 will |
| 21 |
support everything p0 has while eliminating bugs that cripple official |
| 22 |
features advertised for p0. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
V-Li |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 28 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives