| 1 |
On Thu, 10 May 2012 07:19:45 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 05/10/2012 02:19 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:04:12 +0200 |
| 5 |
> > Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> Any particular reason for leaving out "No -j1 for src_test"? It |
| 7 |
> >> was on your previous list. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I couldn't find -j1 being mandated in the spec, and Portage doesn't |
| 10 |
> > seem to do it any more. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Portage still does it (_eapi0_src_test function inside |
| 13 |
> bin/phase-helpers.sh). If the -j1 isn't mandated then I'll just go |
| 14 |
> ahead and remove it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Oh, I missed that. In that case we should probably specifically say -j1 |
| 17 |
for older EAPIs, and not for EAPI 5. From Exherbo's experience, some |
| 18 |
packages do break without the -j1, but not very many. IIRC the -j1 got |
| 19 |
in there originally because two of those packages used to be perl and |
| 20 |
vim, which were two of the things we looked at when creating src_test. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives