Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Rewrite version comparison rules in pseudocode
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:19:25
Message-Id: 200910191819.19454.levertond@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Rewrite version comparison rules in pseudocode by Christian Faulhammer
On Sunday 18 October 2009 18:45:23 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi, > > I like the better readability of algorithmic presentation, but its > wording is not entirely clear, but maybe I am wrong from solely > patch reading. So those are algorithms for the comparison of > components (separated by dots). For me it read on first try like a > comparison of the whole version string, maybe an introducing sentence > like the one you removed is suited:
Not quite sure what you mean by that... it is an algorithm for the whole comparison, but it's broken up for readability.
> -Version specifications are compared component by component, moving > from left to right.
Maybe "Version specifications are compared component by component, moving from left to right, as detailed in Algorithm 1"?
> David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>: > > --- a/pms.cls > > +++ b/pms.cls > > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ > > % Enable the below option if you'd like to see both sides of KDEBUILD > > % conditionals shown in different colours. Disable it to either fully > > % enable or fully disable KDEBUILD. Not compatible with HTML output. > > -\setboolean{ENABLE-ALL-OPTIONS}{false} > > +\setboolean{ENABLE-ALL-OPTIONS}{true} > > Is this intended?
Oops.
> V-Li

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Rewrite version comparison rules in pseudocode Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>