Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>, gentoo-pms@l.g.o, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND | ||
| Date: | Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:07:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4DF4833F.7000401@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On 06/12/2011 01:18 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | >>>>>> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | >> True. How about pkg_setup()? Shall we assume RDEPEND are there or |
| 5 | >> rely on @system only? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > IIUC, with Portage's breaking of dependency cycles there's no absolute |
| 8 | > guarantee that packages in RDEPEND will be available in pkg_*. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | It would be more accurate to say that it's guaranteed except for cases |
| 11 | in which circular dependencies make it impossible to guarantee. |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Thanks, |
| 14 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |