Archives
Archives
| From: | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Fri, 06 Apr 2012 21:56:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | CALc3eMUY8H75B0_TFph=Th9wRQb=6VtgcnnT1u-J60JXxmQ=RA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On 6 April 2012 22:25, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Right, assigning the same EAPI twice would be an example for an ebuild |
| 3 | > that is invalid but accepted by the package manager. But would this |
| 4 | > cause any problems? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Ulrich |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | It's not that it's a problem in itself, it just struck me as an edge |
| 10 | case with the potential for implementations to differ. As long as |
| 11 | everyone's clear what the rules are it's fine. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |