1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, David Leverton wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I think the logic behind that is that an EAPI defined outside PMS |
4 |
> wouldn't be bound by PMS's rules anyway, and the EAPIs defined |
5 |
> inside PMS are explicitly listed so there's not much point giving a |
6 |
> general syntactic rule as well [...] |
7 |
|
8 |
If we follow this logic, then the following sentence should be removed |
9 |
from PMS: |
10 |
|
11 |
"EAPIs whose value starts with the string paludis- are reserved for |
12 |
experimental use by the Paludis package manager." |
13 |
|
14 |
Ulrich |