Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:19:59
Message-Id: 201004032219.50735.levertond@googlemail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade by "Petteri Räty"
On Saturday 03 April 2010 22:11:55 Petteri Räty wrote:
> What is the order that other PMs currently use?
Paludis uses the "old" order for EAPIs 0 and 1, and the "new" order for 2 and 3 (going by the EAPI of the newly-installed package). I thought the plan was for PMS to specify the new order for 2 and later (and in practice, probably make it undefined for 0 and 1) so it's probably an oversight that it doesn't.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>