From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] \t redefinition | ||
Date: | Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:33:56 | ||
Message-Id: | 19729.278.557364.274435@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] \t redefinition by Christian Faulhammer |
1 | >>>>> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
2 | |
3 | >> I'd rather postpone such changes, until the features that didn't |
4 | >> make it for EAPI 4 will have been merged again. |
5 | |
6 | > That was the intention, they build on top of all the other patches. |
7 | |
8 | By "features that didn't make make it" I meant things like the |
9 | following commits: |
10 | <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=409fccc10861c361f37a959195d7581a5c376dd9> |
11 | <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=9d2b8ee57bf3be941cfdfe13650952d91b9edfdc> |
12 | |
13 | Basically, these commits should be reverted when the next EAPI is |
14 | introduced. Which will no longer be easily possible after such |
15 | extensive format changes. |
16 | |
17 | Ulrich |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-pms] \t redefinition | Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> |