1 |
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:26:34PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> 2010/1/17 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>: |
3 |
> >>>>>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> >> Oh heck no. There's no excuse for using 70 or 80 columns for source |
5 |
> >> code any more. My old laptop can fit 100 across the screen |
6 |
> >> comfortably, which is much cleaner to work with. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Some people use several windows side by side, and the natural width of |
9 |
> > these windows is 80 columns because almost all code adheres to it. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Almost all code does not adhere to it. 80 columns is a harmful legacy |
12 |
> that needs to be abandoned now that we are no longer limited by 1970s |
13 |
> terminals. |
14 |
|
15 |
I'm not a particular fan of doing things just because of historical |
16 |
inertia. That said, there are benefits to 80- namely, a shitload of |
17 |
source/text/etc is aimed at 80. I'm not arrogant anything to claim |
18 |
"almost all code does not adhere to it"; I'll state the majority I |
19 |
work with on a day to day basis does however follow 80 w/ exemptions |
20 |
were appropriate. |
21 |
|
22 |
Regardless, what works best for everyone is what should be used. The |
23 |
'git blame' arguement would normally be valid, but in my opinion it's |
24 |
irrelevant in this case- it's a one time blip in tracing the source, |
25 |
further, the commit msgs used for PMS are of pretty varying quality |
26 |
thus decreasing the usefulness of blame. Beyond that, blame is more |
27 |
of a source tool then text tool in terms of usefulness- I honestly |
28 |
can't think of the last time I had to do blame/annotate on PMS. |
29 |
|
30 |
Either way, if the majority of folks find it easiest to work w/ an 80 |
31 |
limit, go with 80. I'd say the same if the magical number was 100 or |
32 |
unlimited. |
33 |
|
34 |
Whatever makes it easiest for people to contribute and work on the |
35 |
document should win out- to be clear, I'm talking about the majority |
36 |
of folk not what best suits one person. |
37 |
|
38 |
Personally, I prefer 80- if it'll help improve the source level |
39 |
reading of PMS and enough folks want it, I'm +1. Barring that, +0. |
40 |
|
41 |
~harring |