| 1 |
On Tue, 1 May 2012 00:14:15 +0200 |
| 2 |
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> * package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force support, as |
| 4 |
> discussed on gentoo-dev (there and on IRC feedback was pretty much |
| 5 |
> positive) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6c492ae43ad7c70cef6aa8ac34911adf.xml |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I'm against this one in a "quick" EAPI, unless you can get a reference |
| 10 |
implementation and extensive testing on possible use scenarios done in |
| 11 |
time. I strongly suspect this will end up having the problems that |
| 12 |
REQUIRED_USE had when it was shoved in at the last minute without |
| 13 |
anyone having properly tried it out... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives