1 |
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:33:48 +0200 |
2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:18:18 +0100 |
4 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:03:37 +0200 |
6 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > > We can basically assume PM merges either DEPEND or RDEPEND to that |
8 |
> > > point (depending on whether we're merging source ebuild or binary |
9 |
> > > package). |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > What if something's a binary (i.e. its DEPENDs aren't being |
12 |
> > installed) and is being installed as part of an RDEPEND - RDEPEND |
13 |
> > cycle? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> We don't think that's even possible because RDEP+DEP cycle would be |
16 |
> unbreakable for the source ebuild. |
17 |
|
18 |
It can be under a use flag, and thus be solvable. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |