1 |
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:48:48 +0100 |
2 |
Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> in commit 6a281c0bc6b951c0885c8787fa5c353a4f4e3d0d I disabled |
4 |
> kdebuild-1 by default. My proposal now is to drop the KDEBUILD |
5 |
> conditionals as a whole as the overlay has gone anyway, where it was |
6 |
> used. We can add a sentence in the introduction or wherever which |
7 |
> says something along the lines like "kdebuild-1 was the first EAPI |
8 |
> like format that supported extended features added to official EAPIs |
9 |
> later on and was heavily tested in the official Gentoo KDE overlay". |
10 |
> This would ease maintenance a bit. |
11 |
|
12 |
As we've already discussed: |
13 |
|
14 |
* Stop committing things that aren't typo fixes without posting them to |
15 |
this list for review. |
16 |
|
17 |
* Don't commit the EAPI 3 / 4 changes until the Council are done |
18 |
changing things, and until we have a patch for the new definition of |
19 |
EAPI 3. We don't have a definition for the new EAPI 3 yet. We also |
20 |
don't have approved summaries of any of the meetings where these |
21 |
things happened. Any changes done now are wasted effort. |
22 |
|
23 |
* Don't mess with kdebuild until you're sure that no-one has any |
24 |
kdebuild packages installed. |
25 |
|
26 |
And as we've not already discussed: |
27 |
|
28 |
* When the heck did "use the highest EAPI" become policy? |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Ciaran McCreesh |