Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:49:38 +0100
> Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote:
>> No matter how nice other features would be, we should regard EAPI
>> 3 similar to EAPI 1 which was a quick thing to get some small
>> features done. Any objections?
>
> Unfortunately, Zac is doing otherwise, and experience shows that what
> Zac does ends up being the final decision. You'll need to either
> convince him to revert the other things he's put in EAPI 3 (which I
> think is just unpack changes, so far), or get the Council to make him
> do so, or persuade the Council to change their minds on what's in 3.
The council doesn't have to "make" me do anything. The final EAPI 3
will have exactly what the council wants and nothing more. I added
xz unpack in EAPI 3_pre2 because I just assumed that everyone would
agree on it. If the council wants to exclude xz unpack in the final
EAPI 3, that's okay and I'll do as the council wishes.
--
Thanks,
Zac
|
|
