From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 | ||
Date: | Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:53:24 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120429175043.4343b433@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 by Ralph Sennhauser |
1 | On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:20:01 +0200 |
2 | Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > * IMPLICIT_IUSE |
4 | > |
5 | > Finally allow to write legal ebuilds respecting Prefix wish to not |
6 | > have to add prefix to IUSE. A solution was proposed and approved by |
7 | > council. |
8 | > |
9 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366555 |
10 | |
11 | That one's one of the "things that were left out of EAPI 4". |
12 | IMPLICIT_IUSE isn't something you can do on its own without the rest of |
13 | the original-EAPI-3 USE cleanup. |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 | Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 | Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> |