Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:16:01 +0100
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:13:09 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> Anyway, what's the usage case for having the EAPI assignment after the
> inherit command? Currently this is forbidden.

It is? By the spec, or by QA policy? If it's just the latter, we can't
rely upon people following it.

I think this whole thing goes away if you also require in the spec
(i.e. PMS, not QA) that the EAPI assignment be done before anything
else.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
References:
EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- David Leverton
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- David Leverton
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Next by thread:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Previous by date:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Next by date:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.