Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:18:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120410211601.58b2fb43@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:13:09 +0200 |
| 2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Anyway, what's the usage case for having the EAPI assignment after the |
| 4 | > inherit command? Currently this is forbidden. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | It is? By the spec, or by QA policy? If it's just the latter, we can't |
| 7 | rely upon people following it. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I think this whole thing goes away if you also require in the spec |
| 10 | (i.e. PMS, not QA) that the EAPI assignment be done before anything |
| 11 | else. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |