1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> For anything I wrote from scratch, I'm fine with any licence that |
4 |
> allows package manager authors to relicence it under whatever it is |
5 |
> they use themselves. |
6 |
|
7 |
Thanks. |
8 |
|
9 |
> I remain unconvinced that any of this is relevant, and by sticking |
10 |
> an explicit licence on the code we're probably just making things |
11 |
> worse... |
12 |
|
13 |
Well, CC0-1.0-Universal isn't really a license, it's rather a |
14 |
copyright waiver. Comparable to WTFPL-2, but with a wording that may |
15 |
be more appropriate in some situations. ;) |
16 |
|
17 |
Ulrich |