| 1 |
2010/1/17 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 3 |
>> A thing I would like to talk about it. Why is the line wrap the way |
| 4 |
>> it is? Emacs always complains and he has the authority regarding line |
| 5 |
>> wrap. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Lines with a width of 100 characters are hard to read, therefore I |
| 8 |
> would much prefer a more conventional value like 70 or 72. Maybe with |
| 9 |
> exceptions for some of the tables. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> A good time for making such a change would be when EAPI 3 is finished. |
| 12 |
> What do you think? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Oh heck no. There's no excuse for using 70 or 80 columns for source |
| 15 |
code any more. My old laptop can fit 100 across the screen |
| 16 |
comfortably, which is much cleaner to work with. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
This bikeshed does not need repainting bright pink with orange spots. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives