| 1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> It was on the council page when I read your mail. And is this in |
| 4 |
>> any way relevant? We have a summary now. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Because your sarcastic reply suggests some kind of inaccuracy on my |
| 7 |
> part, |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Yes, sorry, I didn't double check the commit time of the summary when |
| 10 |
I found that it's on the council's page. Also leio had sent the final |
| 11 |
version to the council ml two days before. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> whereas in fact you're trying to pull a fast one. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Not true. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> A correct and appropriate response would be "This has now been fixed |
| 18 |
> [1]". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Right. This has now been fixed. So can we end this useless discussion |
| 21 |
now? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Ulrich |
Archives