Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker?
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 21:40:42 +0200
>>>>> On Sun, 6 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> It's easy to miss some places that have to be updated when adding a new
> EAPI. This hack fixes that. It works like this:

> In pms.tex, at the top, we say

>     \CurrentEAPIIs{4}

> Then everywhere where we have EAPI dependent content, we put

>     \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI{4}

> which we can then grep for. Also, if you change the current EAPI, and
> forget to change any of the markers, an error is produced.

This looks a bit over-engineered to me. Wouldn't simple comments serve
the same purpose?

Ulrich


Replies:
Re: [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
References:
[PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
[PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker?
Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker?
Previous by date:
Re: Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5?
Next by date:
Re: [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker?


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.