Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@g.o>
Subject: Re: Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5?
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:33:40 +0200
+1 from me.

Am Sonntag, den 06.05.2012, 18:15 +0100 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5, to go with apply_user_patches?
> If we don't, users will have to either work out the patch command
> themselves, or hope that ebuilds they want to patch inherit eutils. 
> 

Attachment:
smime.p7s (S/MIME cryptographic signature)
References:
Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5?
Next by thread:
EAPI 5 development branch
Previous by date:
Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5?
Next by date:
Re: [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker?


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.