1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> We also don't know when we'll have a spec of what EAPI 3 is, so |
4 |
> there's no point in tinkering with PMS until we do. |
5 |
|
6 |
Come on. Renaming from 3 to 4 is trivial. |
7 |
|
8 |
>> > We also don't have approved summaries of any of the meetings where |
9 |
>> > these things happened. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> And what is [1] then? |
12 |
|
13 |
> Something that wasn't there when I sent the original email, as you |
14 |
> know very well. |
15 |
|
16 |
It was on the council page when I read your mail. And is this in any |
17 |
way relevant? We have a summary now. |
18 |
|
19 |
Ulrich |