Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: Bash features
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:58:21 +0000
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> > Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there should
> > be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively?
> 
> Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed:
> 
> | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with
> | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted.

Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single
3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable
with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least
one version of bash-3.2_psomething".

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Bash features
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Bash features
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Bash features
-- Petteri R├Ąty
References:
Bash features
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Bash features
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Bash features
-- Ulrich Mueller
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Bash features
Next by thread:
Re: Bash features
Previous by date:
Re: Bash features
Next by date:
Re: Bash features


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.