1 |
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100 |
2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there should |
4 |
> > be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with |
9 |
> | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted. |
10 |
|
11 |
Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single |
12 |
3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable |
13 |
with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least |
14 |
one version of bash-3.2_psomething". |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |