Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o>
Subject: Re: EAPI 5
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:41:37 +0200
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:50:43 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:20:01 +0200
> Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> wrote:
> > * IMPLICIT_IUSE
> > 
> >   Finally allow to write legal ebuilds respecting Prefix wish to not
> >   have to add prefix to IUSE. A solution was proposed and approved
> > by council.
> > 
> >   https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366555
> 
> That one's one of the "things that were left out of EAPI 4".
> IMPLICIT_IUSE isn't something you can do on its own without the rest
> of the original-EAPI-3 USE cleanup.
> 
> 

Is there anything beside the IMPLICIT_IUSE left from the original EAPI
3 proposal which didn't made it into either EAPI 3 or 4 but would be
required?

I don't mind if EAPI 5 is the only EAPI properly handling this case and
declaring it undefined behaviour (in fact the same as the current
situation) for earlier ones.

Ralph
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
EAPI 5 (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making user patches globally available)
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: EAPI 5
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI 5
-- Ralph Sennhauser
Re: EAPI 5
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: EAPI 5
Next by thread:
Re: EAPI 5
Previous by date:
Re: EAPI 5
Next by date:
Re: EAPI 5


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.