| 1 |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:26:54 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> A more general question, should such patches that do not change the |
| 4 |
> meaning of the text be sent to this list for review? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I'd be inclined to say yes, unless it's something that's so amazingly |
| 7 |
obvious that it couldn't possibly be wrong. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
A lack of responses to trivial patch emails doesn't mean they're being |
| 10 |
ignored. It just means no-one's got anything to say about them, but |
| 11 |
doesn't think the patch is controversial enough to warrant a "looks |
| 12 |
good to me". |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives