Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 13:58:07 +0100
On Mon, 7 May 2012 02:12:14 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> | Furthermore, for these EAPIs, if the function is overridden, it
> | shall be a fatal error if the apply_user_patches command has not
> | been called at least once by the end of the phase.
> 
> Wouldn't it make more sense to call apply_user_patches implicitly at
> the end of the phase, if it hasn't been called before?
> 
> Otherwise, a call to that function would have to be added to every
> ebuild that defines src_prepare.

That was the point. The discussion on gentoo-dev suggested that "at the
end" is often the wrong place to put it, due to eautoreconf etc. We
need people to be explicit about where it goes.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch)
-- Ulrich Mueller
References:
EAPI 5 development branch
-- Ciaran McCreesh
apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch)
-- Ulrich Mueller
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch)
Next by thread:
Re: apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch)
Previous by date:
apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch)
Next by date:
Re: apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch)


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.