| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> >>>>> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:42:01 +0100 |
| 8 |
> > Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> >> as I now learnt, Bash 3.2 vanilla is not enough for some eclasses |
| 10 |
> >> to run. Patchlevel 48 is needed. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> What eclasses are this? _p48 isn't marked as stable. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So it is another patch level, but vanilla Bash 3.2 won't work with |
| 15 |
python.eclass at different positions (mostly if conditions, can't tell |
| 16 |
what part exactly). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> >> Should we tighten the version string for Bash? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I don't think there's a need for this, as the patches are only |
| 21 |
> bugfixes. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sure, but the tree is hit by a needed bug fix. I researched a lot, |
| 24 |
because I bootstrapped with vanilla 3.2 and did not accuse it of the |
| 25 |
failures I saw. Maybe something like "the latest available" is doable. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
V-Li |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 31 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives