List Archive: gentoo-pms
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Ulrich Mueller <email@example.com>:
> >>>>> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:42:01 +0100
> > Christian Faulhammer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> as I now learnt, Bash 3.2 vanilla is not enough for some eclasses
> >> to run. Patchlevel 48 is needed.
> What eclasses are this? _p48 isn't marked as stable.
So it is another patch level, but vanilla Bash 3.2 won't work with
python.eclass at different positions (mostly if conditions, can't tell
what part exactly).
> >> Should we tighten the version string for Bash?
> I don't think there's a need for this, as the patches are only
Sure, but the tree is hit by a needed bug fix. I researched a lot,
because I bootstrapped with vanilla 3.2 and did not accuse it of the
failures I saw. Maybe something like "the latest available" is doable.
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode