List Archive: gentoo-pms
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:02:41 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <email@example.com> wrote:
> > We also don't know when we'll have a spec of what EAPI 3 is, so
> > there's no point in tinkering with PMS until we do.
> Come on. Renaming from 3 to 4 is trivial.
...and, from the looks of things, completely wrong. Zac has started
putting some of the things that that patch moved from 3 to 4 in the
3_pre series. Now we're going to have to play a fun game of bouncing
things backwards and forward between EAPIs to match Zac's whims, which
don't seem to agree with the most recent Council vote on the subject.
As I said when Christian first asked, waiting until all this had been
settled before doing anything is the much better solution.