List Archive: gentoo-pms
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>:
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there
> > > should be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively?
> > Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed:
> > | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with
> > | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted.
> Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single
> 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable
> with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least
> one version of bash-3.2_psomething".
So one has to work around obvious bugs to satisfy p0? p9999 will
support everything p0 has while eliminating bugs that cripple official
features advertised for p0.
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode