1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100 |
6 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > > Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there |
8 |
> > > should be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively? |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed: |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with |
13 |
> > | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single |
16 |
> 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable |
17 |
> with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least |
18 |
> one version of bash-3.2_psomething". |
19 |
|
20 |
So one has to work around obvious bugs to satisfy p0? p9999 will |
21 |
support everything p0 has while eliminating bugs that cripple official |
22 |
features advertised for p0. |
23 |
|
24 |
V-Li |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
28 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
29 |
|
30 |
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |