Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features | ||
| Date: | Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:06:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100109000834.6f6ed79a@snowmobile | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-pms] Bash features by Christian Faulhammer |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:42:01 +0100 |
| 2 | Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > as I now learnt, Bash 3.2 vanilla is not enough for some eclasses to |
| 4 | > run. Patchlevel 48 is needed. Should we tighten the version string |
| 5 | > for Bash? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there should be |
| 8 | forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |