Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | council@g.o, gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 4 approval | ||
| Date: | Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:23:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 19738.61438.451956.311867@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 4 approval by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > So unless there are any last-minute changes (Fauli?), the following |
| 4 | > commit should be tagged: |
| 5 | |
| 6 | There's another trivial update (removal of an unused file, output is |
| 7 | not affected), so the commit to be tagged is: |
| 8 | <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc> |
| 9 | |
| 10 | > The tag should be called "eapi-4-approved-2010-12-30" if we follow the |
| 11 | > convention we used for EAPIs 2 and 3. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 4 approval | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |