Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: Petteri R├Ąty <betelgeuse@g.o>
Subject: Re: Bash features
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:17:28 +0200
On 01/09/2010 10:58 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
>>> Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there should
>>> be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively?
>>
>> Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed:
>>
>> | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with
>> | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted.
> 
> Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single
> 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable
> with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least
> one version of bash-3.2_psomething".
> 

At least my opinion is all instead of any.

Regards,
Petteri

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
Bash features
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Bash features
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Bash features
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Bash features
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Bash features
Next by thread:
Re: Bash features
Previous by date:
Re: Bash features
Next by date:
Re: Bash features


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.