List Archive: gentoo-pms
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 01/09/2010 10:58 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there should
>>> be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively?
>> Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed:
>> | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with
>> | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted.
> Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single
> 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable
> with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least
> one version of bash-3.2_psomething".
At least my opinion is all instead of any.