Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
Subject: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:09:31 +0200
Dear team, 

some time ago we have already been discussing [1] the possibilities of 
restricting use flags in a stabilized ebuild.

Based on the outcome of that thread I've written a patch for PMS, which 
extends the section on USE masking and forcing. 

It is included in this e-mail, and I would like to submit it for discussion 
and eventually inclusion in master and eapi-5 branch. As for an 
implementation, I gathered from Zac that it's not particularly hard to do and 
that he liked the idea.

It is certainly possible refine this more. Allowing only EAPI=5 ebuilds in 
package.use.stable.*, and have the files only take effect there, comes to my 
mind. However I doubt if these restrictions are really necessary and if a EAPI 
dependence at this place in the profile makes actually sense.



Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer 
kde (team lead), sci, tex, arm, printing
0001-Add-specification-for-stable-use-forcing-masking.patch (Text Data)
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Re: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Authorship of app-doc/pms
Next by thread:
Re: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
Previous by date:
Re: Authorship of app-doc/pms
Next by date:
Re: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force

Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.