Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:46:08 +0200
>>>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Well, I still think it's horrible (and I think the same about
>> pretty much anything else using has_version...), but I can't come
>> up with any creative way of interpreting PMS to say that it
>> *should* be illegal... So if we're making a change, it's a
>> retroactive one to work around a Portage bug...

> Going with it being a Portage bug is fine by me.

+1

Changing PMS seems unnatural in this case. Why should the USE flag
syntax for has_version be different from the one in dependencies?

Ulrich


References:
Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4
-- Petteri Räty
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4
Next by thread:
Re: Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4
Previous by date:
Re: Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4
Next by date:
Moving PMS hosting


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.