List Archive: gentoo-pms
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
>>>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Well, I still think it's horrible (and I think the same about
>> pretty much anything else using has_version...), but I can't come
>> up with any creative way of interpreting PMS to say that it
>> *should* be illegal... So if we're making a change, it's a
>> retroactive one to work around a Portage bug...
> Going with it being a Portage bug is fine by me.
Changing PMS seems unnatural in this case. Why should the USE flag
syntax for has_version be different from the one in dependencies?