1 |
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 18:34:37 +0100 |
2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> >>>>> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
4 |
> >> No objections. Maybe a footnote in section 2.2 "Defined EAPIs"? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > Yes, that would be a good place. Could you please prepare a new |
7 |
> > patch? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Attached. Only change to previous version is addition of a footnote: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> \footnote{Another inofficial EAPI `kdebuild-1' was a series of |
12 |
> extensions to EAPI `1' formerly used by the Gentoo KDE project. |
13 |
> Some of its features have been included in EAPI `2' or later.} |
14 |
|
15 |
'Inofficial' isn't really a word, no matter what Google suggests. It |
16 |
looks weird with 'in' rather than 'un'. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |