1 |
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:28:26 +0200 |
2 |
Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> But I think I will go away from the calculated page layouts defined |
4 |
> by typearea.sty. It uses the golden ratio (see |
5 |
> <URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canons_of_page_construction>, you |
6 |
> will find two-page layouts there, too), which is great, but I will |
7 |
> adapt it for our needs. So near to a canon, one-sided and with a |
8 |
> bigger outer (right margin). |
9 |
|
10 |
I've switched the eapi-3 draft to use book rather than article for now |
11 |
so that the margin labels are more or less readable. That's just a |
12 |
temporary thing, it's still yours to play with. |
13 |
|
14 |
I've pushed what I've done so far to [1]. The labels should be more or |
15 |
less complete; I'm going through and reviewing all the EAPI 3 stuff and |
16 |
fixing as many of the TODOs as I can next, so there'll still be lots of |
17 |
rebasing. If you find time to come up with any better formatting, I can |
18 |
apply normal patches if you'd rather not work out how to make git do |
19 |
your bidding. |
20 |
|
21 |
[1]: http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |