On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:56:17PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 04:44:15 -0700
> Brian Harring <ferringb@...> wrote:
> > Config arguably would benefit from env saving, but portage hasn't
> > done it afaik, ever, so we can't really go retroactive on that one.
> Hrm. Paludis loads the env for vdb for pkg_info (for installed things)
> and for pkg_config, but doesn't write it back again afterwards. Is this
> not what Portage does?
Doesn't save for config at the very least; actual loading, didn't
check. As for load, well, trojan the env to find out (5am my time,
going back to bed, someone else can figure it out).
My inclincation is loading for info/config, saving for config, but
portage long term behaviour here on the saving for config is likely
going to be problematic.