| 1 |
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 22:59:52 Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 2 |
> This seems ok, although all the TeX4HT stuff is some kind of a bad |
| 3 |
> hack. Do we really need the HTML target? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
"Need" is relative. It's not strictly required, but people seem to like it |
| 6 |
(and it seems to have mostly silenced the LaTeX-haters). It is also more |
| 7 |
convenient if you want to look something up quickly - just open the URL in |
| 8 |
your browser, no need to open up a PDF viewer and find the right page. And |
| 9 |
yes, TeX4ht is rather hackish, but the output is nice after a small amount |
| 10 |
amount of babysitting. The only thing I don't like is that it puts footnotes |
| 11 |
in their own HTML files. |
Archives