Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 22:59:52 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> This seems ok, although all the TeX4HT stuff is some kind of a bad
> hack. Do we really need the HTML target?
"Need" is relative. It's not strictly required, but people seem to like it
(and it seems to have mostly silenced the LaTeX-haters). It is also more
convenient if you want to look something up quickly - just open the URL in
your browser, no need to open up a PDF viewer and find the right page. And
yes, TeX4ht is rather hackish, but the output is nice after a small amount
amount of babysitting. The only thing I don't like is that it puts footnotes
in their own HTML files.
|
|
