Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: Clarify wording on self-blockers
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:25:26 +0100
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:19:17 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> I don't like adding such "undefined" bits in cases where portage
> behaviour is well-defined.

It's not well-defined, though. Different Portage versions have done
very different things for it. Remember that strong vs weak blockers are
a recent invention, and that in the old days Portage treated all
blockers as being a bit like what strong blockers are now.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Clarify wording on self-blockers
-- Maciej Mrozowski
References:
Clarify wording on self-blockers
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Clarify wording on self-blockers
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Clarify wording on self-blockers
-- Ulrich Mueller
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Clarify wording on self-blockers
Next by thread:
Re: Clarify wording on self-blockers
Previous by date:
Re: Clarify wording on self-blockers
Next by date:
Re: Clarify wording on self-blockers


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.