Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>
Subject: Re: The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 00:22:11 +0300
On 04/04/2010 12:19 AM, David Leverton wrote:
> On Saturday 03 April 2010 22:11:55 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> What is the order that other PMs currently use?
> 
> Paludis uses the "old" order for EAPIs 0 and 1, and the "new" order for 2 and 
> 3 (going by the EAPI of the newly-installed package).  I thought the plan was 
> for PMS to specify the new order for 2 and later (and in practice, probably 
> make it undefined for 0 and 1) so it's probably an oversight that it doesn't.
> 

Yeah this seems prudent to me and was actually what we were just talking
about on #gentoo-dev.

Regards,
Petteri

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade
-- Petteri Räty
Re: The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade
-- David Leverton
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade
Next by thread:
Three patches for review
Previous by date:
Re: The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade
Next by date:
Rejoining the project


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.