List Archive: gentoo-pms
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:21:43 +0200
Luca Barbato <email@example.com> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:28:44 +0200
> > Patrick Lauer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> [ fix PMS to demand bash 3.2 instead of 3.0 ]
> In short you are asking to put this item for the next council meeting.
No, I'd like to see a discussion on gentoo-dev@ started by someone who
thinks we should make the change, where that person explains fully both
sides of the decision without resorting to FUD or comments like
"warblgarbl". Once that discussion has taken place, and any new
viewpoints have been discussed, *then* I'd like to see the matter go to
I don't think we should be asking for comments on changes until after
the developer-base at large has had a chance to discuss the issue. This
isn't a simple "there are advantages and no disadvantages" issue, which
is largely why it's been avoided until now.